Tech Thoughts: v.o1.o9

Amazing stat-line from one Mr. Andy Bitter here folks.

And as Nick Bakay used to author over on ESPN.com: “…the numbers don’t lie.”

70.2%?!?

That 70% quotient sure seems like code for 100% abuse to me.

...30% from the rest?
…30% from the rest?

I don’t know about you, though to me, that’s just too much.
Flirting with too damn much.

Not to mention being too damn predictable.

Even George Lazenby, the weakest James Bond of them all; would easily know who to spy or to shadow at that level of expectancy.


No wonder he was very close to only being able to run a 4.7 40 at the end of the year. “That’s a Te time…” as one observer on a higher than college level put it to me.

Additionally, I could see why momma-bear LT3 might wonder Whiskey Tango Helen VT was doing with her baby-bear?

Makes one wonder how much of LT3, LT3 left out on the field as a physically smaller Qb would surely be more diminished going forth. Just ask R.Marshall and G.Smith of wvu fame if you don’t believe me.

Great Stat line Andy!

How say you?

70.2% of LT3 in 2013 was..................???

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 LETS GO!

Hokies!

 bourbonstreet**

8 Responses You are logged in as Test

  1. B-Street, while I agree that 70% is far too much, I would also like to point out that LT might not be the best at reading the DE/OLB during the read option run plays. That play is not effective when he keeps it almost every time (predictable as you mentioned) as I believe he was doing in the first half of the season. Not sure if he didn’t trust his RBs but seemed to content to keep the ball even with a defender crashing down.

    1. Yah; n/k!
      Only later in his career did he begin to pitch(out) a bit.
      And even then, it will awkward on timing at best.

      b.street

  2. I ask you…what was the alternative? A poor rotation of mismatched running backs, many of whom had the ball snatched from them in the read-option mesh most of the time. Tough to get lathered up in a game when you don’t know when or how your touches are coming.

  3. Ideally, this was too much LT3. With what we had (inconsistent everywhere except… no wait, yeah, everywhere), it was about the right amount of LT3. He was far and away the best player on the field for the Hokies’ offense, it’s only fitting he should carry the load.

    1. You came strong.
      Had a good take.
      +3!

      I like that.
      Not sayin’ I agry.
      Though that was well done.

      b.street

  4. Agree with the other poster. LT was quite often a ball hog in running the read option. It was clear he often had no intention of giving up the ball, or just couldn’t read the defense to make the right decision. IMO as much of this is on LT as it is on the coaching staff.

Comments are closed.